Legal Opinion
United Federation of Teachers Welfare Fund v. Kramarsky
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 11, 1981No. 16, Docket 78-7317PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEARSE, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff is an organization established by collective bargaining between the United Federation of Teachers and the City of New York. It maintains an employee welfare benefit plan that is subject to federal regulation under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. (1976). Plaintiff is also subject to New York’s Human Rights Law, N.Y.Exec. Law § 296 (McKinney 1972 & Supp.1980-1981) (“HRL”). HRL requires that disability benefit plans such as plaintiff’s provide benefits for disabilities related to pregnancy on the same basis…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. KramarskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Lumber, Production & Industrial Workers Local 2362 v. WondzellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Minnesota ex rel. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Northeast Department Ilgwu Health and Welfare Fund and Sol Hoffman v. Teamsters Local Union No. 229 Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Hashemi v. ShackDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- 31 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1788, 26 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,882 United Federation of Teachers Welfare Fund v. Werner Kramarsky, as Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human RightsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Northeast Department Ilgwu Health and Welfare Fund and Sol Hoffman v. Teamsters Local Union No. 229 Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985