Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist
This case requires that we decide whether our decision in Younger v. Harris, 401 U. S. 37 (1971), bars a federal district court from intervening in a state civil proceeding such as this, when the proceeding is based on a state statute believed by the district court to be unconstitutional. A similar issue was raised in Gibson v. Berry hill, 411 U. S. 564 (1973), but we were not required to decide it because there the enjoined state proceedings were before a biased administrative body which could not provide a necessary predicate for a Younger dismissal, that is, “the opportunity to raise and…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,706 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
1,701 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.