Legal Opinion
Juidice v. Vail
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 22, 1977No. 75-1397PublishedCited by 1,217 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist
Appellee Harry Vail, Jr., is a judgment debtor who was held in contempt of court by the County Court of Dutchess County, N. Y., and who thereafter sought to have the statutory provisions authorizing contempts enjoined as unconstitutional *329in an action brought under 42 U. S. C. § 1983 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The state-court proceedings against Vail were found by the District Court to be in most respects representative of those against the other named appellees as well.1
Vail defaulted on a credit arrangement with the Public Loan Co., and in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,217 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
1,212 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.