Legal Opinion

Schram v. Albertson's, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 19, 1997No. 9411-07604; CA A91574PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Plaintiff appeals from summary judgment in favor of defendants Albertson’s, Sturgill, and Cooper on plaintiff’s claims of unlawful employment discrimination under ORS 659.030, common-law wrongful discharge, and intentional interference with an employment relationship. Summary judgment is appropriate if the moving party can show that the pleadings, depositions and affidavits raise no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ORCP 47C; Jones v. General Motors Corp., 139 Or App 244, 911 P2d 1243, rev allowed 323 Or 483 (1996). In…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. McGanty v. StaudenrausOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Holien v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Delaney v. Taco Time International, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Wampler v. PalmertonOregon Supreme Court · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Vivian v. MadisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  2. Alpha Energy Savers, Inc., an Oregon Corporation Robert Obrist v. Diane Hansen Multnomah County Judy SwendsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Carr v. United Parcel ServiceTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Casciola v. F.S. Air Service, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Draper v. Astoria School District No. 1CDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API