Nees v. Hocks

The principal question is whether the plaintiff alleged and proved conduct of the defendants which amounts to a tort of some nature.

In this court the defendants sought to have us reexamine the evidence. As we have so often stated, we cannot reweigh the evidence and if there is any evidence to support the verdict of the jury, we must affirm.

The jury found for plaintiff; therefore, we must consider the facts as established by the evidence most favorable to plaintiff. The plaintiff performed clerical duties for defendants. She started work in 1971. In 1972 she was called for jury duty; however,…