Legal Opinion
Holien v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 23, 1984No. TC A7905-02100 CA A22566 SC S30513PublishedCited by 150 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*80JONES, J.
In this case, plaintiff sued for damages for employment discrimination under ORS 659.030(1) and 659.121(1), and also sought damages for the common law tort of wrongful discharge. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendants. The trial court found no liability or damages under the statutory claim and granted defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co. (Sears) a summary judgment on the claim alleging common law wrongful discharge. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the case for retrial on the common law wrongful discharge claim. Defendant Sears petitions this court to review and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Great American Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. NovotnySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Paulette L. Barnes v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of the Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by150 opinions
- Raymond M. Cornwell v. Electra Central Credit Union James E. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Collins v. RizkanaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Jerrold S. HELLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EBB AUTO CO., Dba Ron Tonkin Mitsubishi, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Sheets v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1989
145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.