Legal Opinion

Casciola v. F.S. Air Service, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 2005No. S-11023PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETIL Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Phillip Casciola and his wholly-owned corporation, Jetbroker.com, Inc. ("Jetbroker"), obtained $25,000 from F.S. Air Service, Inc. ("F.S. Air") by misrepresenting Jetbroker's ability to procure two Learjet engines for F.S. Air, FS. Air sued Casciola and Jet-broker for misrepresentation and breach of contract after Jetbroker failed to deliver the engines or return the deposit. Following summary judgment and a damages trial, Casciola and Jetbroker were held jointly and severally liable for compensatory and punitive damages. Casciola now appeals the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. James K. Lee v. Michael EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Wright v. AndingAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Olivit v. City and Borough of JuneauAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Brown v. KnowlesAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Samson Tug & Barge Co. v. KoziolDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2012
  5. Deloycheet, Inc. v. Beach (In re Beach)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Alaska · 2017

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API