Legal Opinion
McGanty v. Staudenraus
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 8, 1995No. CC CV91-357; CA A75978; SC S40963PublishedCited by 282 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.
This case involves the requirements for pleading three torts: intentional interference with economic relations, intentional infliction of severe emotional distress, and wrongful discharge. We hold that the trial court did not commit reversible error when it dismissed plaintiffs claim for intentional interference with economic relations, but that it did err in dismissing plaintiffs claims for intentional infliction of severe emotional distress and wrongful discharge.
Plaintiff was an employee of defendant Metropolitan Agencies, Inc., (Metropolitan) a collection agency. Defendant Staudenraus was…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Jett v. Dallas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Hall v. May Department Stores Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Sheets v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Brewer v. ErwinOregon Supreme Court · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by282 opinions
- Deborah Wood v. Gcc Bend, Llc, an Oregon Limited Liability CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Celia G. Zimmerman v. Direct Federal Credit Union and David BreslinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Alpha Energy Savers, Inc., an Oregon Corporation Robert Obrist v. Diane Hansen Multnomah County Judy SwendsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Tudor v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- Martin v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
277 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.