Legal Opinion

Bruno v. Golden Bell Dairy

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1961PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

The complaint alleged that the negligence of the driver consisted of failing to shake the snow from his boots before he entered the premises, thus allowing slush and snow to drip off his boots on the steps, making them .slippery and unsafe; and that he failed to warn the plaintiff, of the dangerous condition thereof. •

In ruling upon the motion for a directed verdict it was the duty of the trial court to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. It was then its duty to apply the rule laid down by this court in the following language:

“A verdict may properly be directed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Osborne v. MontgomeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Rusch v. Sentinel-News Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Larson v. SplettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Wadoz v. United National Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Johanson v. Webster Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bentzler v. BraunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Jacobson v. Greyhound Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Lee v. Milwaukee Gas Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Paaske v. Perfex Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Lee v. Milwaukee Gas Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API