Legal Opinion

Jacobson v. Greyhound Corp.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1965PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

Two issues are raised upon this appeal— (1) was it error to exclude the expert testimony, and (2) was it error to grant the motion for a directed verdict?

Greyhound called two county highway commissioners to give expert opinion testimony as to the proper manner of plowing snow and as to whether Lyons, the driver of the Clark county snowplow, operated the vehicle at an excessive speed. The two county highway commissioners were John E. Smith from Eau Claire county, and Stewart O’Flanigan from Dunn county. While testimony of the two witnesses is not identical, it is essentially so; for this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Henthorn v. M. G. C. Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Rusch v. Sentinel-News Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Anderson v. EggertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Kreyer v. FARMERS'CO-OPERATIVE LUMBER CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Chapnitsky v. McCloneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Bentzler v. BraunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Cramer v. Theda Clark Memorial HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Rabata v. DohnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Valiga v. National Food Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API