Legal Opinion

Paaske v. Perfex Corp.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1964PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDieterich, J.

The only issue involved on the instant appeal is whether there was a violation of the safe-place statute. The record reveals the following facts. On November 16, 1959, appellant Justin Paaske was employed as a mason by the Hackett Construction Company, and was working on the premises of the respondent Perfex Corporation in the city of Milwaukee. Paaske was constructing a wall which was to eventually enclose an open area between two buildings belonging to Perfex. The wall upon which he was working joined the existing wall of the building at right angles. Several steel beams protruded from the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Zehren v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Neitzke v. Kraft-Phenix Dairies, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Powless v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Hipke v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Davies v. J. D. Wilson Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Strack v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Gross v. DenowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Steinhorst v. H. C. Prange Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Hofflander v. St. Catherine's Hospital, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Carr v. Amusement, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API