Larson v. Splett
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
Plaintiffs’ complaint alleges damages as the result of misrepresentation, fraud, and deceit by defendants in the sale of the farm, in that (1) the cattle were infected with brucellosis, (2) the machinery was not in working condition, (3) one of the sows was not bred, and (4) certain portions of the land were not tillable.
The elements of fraud are stated in International Milling Co. v. Priem (1923), 179 Wis. 622, 624, 192 N. W. 68, as follows:
“To be actionable the false representation must consist, first, of a statement of fact which is untrue; second, that it was made with intent to defraud…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hyer v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Bowe v. GageWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- International Milling Co. v. PriemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Tegen v. ChapinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Richards v. MillardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Whipp v. IversonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Zillmer v. MiglautschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Dickman v. SchaefferWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Rodenkirch v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Household Finance Corp. v. ChristianWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.