Legal Opinion

Gill v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1930No. 22442. Department OnePublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

Plaintiff, the holder of a policy of accident insurance written by defendant, brought suit upon the policy, alleging that she had suffered bodily injury which entitled her to receive from defendant certain payments under the policy, of which she was the owner. In her complaint, plaintiff alleged the issu- anee by defendant of a policy of accident insurance in her favor under date June 21, 1926, a copy of the policy being attached to the complaint as an exhibit. Paragraph III of plaintiff’s complaint reads as follows:

“That on the 30th day of October, A. D. 1928, during the life of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Port Blakely Mill Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Moore v. National Accident SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Burbank v. Pioneer Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Moore v. National Accident SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Van Dyke v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Van Dyke v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API