Legal Opinion

Van Dyke v. White

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1960No. 34819Published

1Opinion of the Court

55 Wn.2d 601 (1960)

349 P.2d 430

PETER VAN DYKE et al., Appellants,

v.

THEODORE WHITE, Defendant, MAYFLOWER INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Respondent.[1]

No. 34819.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

February 11, 1960.

Morrison, Lake, Cael & Huppin (Gordon E. Lake, of counsel), for appellants.

Palmer, Willis & McArdle, for respondent.

FOSTER, J.

Van Dyke and wife, plaintiffs below, appeal from a judgment dismissing a writ of garnishment against the Mayflower Insurance Exchange.

The controversy revolves around an automobile accident in January, 1955, in which the appellants' car was struck from the rear by…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. G. A. Stowers Furniture Co. v. American Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Hilker v. Western Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Anderson v. EatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. Rudco Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API