Legal Opinion

Van Dyke v. White

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1960No. 34819PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

Van Dyke and wife, plaintiffs below, appeal from a judgment dismissing a writ of garnishment against the Mayflower Insurance Exchange.

The controversy revolves around an automobile accident in January, 1955, in which the appellants’ car was struck from the rear by one driven by T. R. White, who had a standard automobile liability insurance policy written by respondent, Mayflower Insurance Exchange. The policy contained the standard provisions requiring notice to the company within sixty days of all accidents; co-operation with the insurer in the defense of all actions; and a provision…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. G. A. Stowers Furniture Co. v. American Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Hilker v. Western Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Anderson v. EatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Douglas v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1924

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Oregon Automobile Insurance v. SalzbergWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Employers Casualty Company v. TilleyTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Continental Insurance Co. v. Bayless & Roberts, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Waite v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1970

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API