Legal Opinion

Moore v. National Accident Society

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1908No. 7083PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Kittitas county, Rigg, J., entered April 17, 1907, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff,. after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action upon a policy of accident insurance.'

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff to recover benefits under an accident insurance policy. Upon the first trial a judgment of nonsuit was rendered against plaintiff, which judgment was subsequently reversed by this court. 38 Wash. 31, 80 Pac. 171. Upon the remanding of the case, a second trial was had, resulting in a judgment in favor of plaintiff, from which defendant prosecutes this appeal.

Appellant raises but one question, to wit: “Was this action commenced within the time limited by the contract of the parties as expressed in the policy itself?” Respondent contends that this question…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. National Accident SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Wheeler v. City of AberdeenWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Grant v. WalshWashington Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gill v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API