Port Blakely Mill Co. v. Hartford Fire Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Kitsap county-, Yakey, J., entered February 29, 1908, in favor of the plaintiffs, upon stipulation and a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action on fire insurance policies.
1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.
This action was commenced by Port Blakely Mill Company,' a corporation, and Detroit Trust Company, a corporation, to recover on certain insurance policies for a loss sustained by fire. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, the defendant has appealed.
The appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying its challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, in entering judgment for respondents, and in refusing to enter judgment in its favor. The respondents sued upon five policies of fire insurance, written by appellant upon a large milling plant owned by the Port Blakely Mill Company,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Slocovich v. Orient Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Freeman v. Travelers' InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Starr v. Aetna Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Redman v. Ætna InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Chambers v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Van Dyke v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Mechanics' Ins. Co. of Philadelphia v. C. A. Hoover Distilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- Fagg v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Home Ins. Co. of New York v. Sullivan MacHinery Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Pacific S. S. Co. v. SuttonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.