Legal Opinion

Burbank v. Pioneer Mutual Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1910No. 8851PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Lincoln county, Neal, J., entered November 20,1909, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action on a policy of fire insurance.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

J. E. Burbank and T. F. Graham, copartner» as J. E. Burbank & Co., commenced this action upon a policy issued by Pioneer Mutual Insurance Association, a corporation, to recover loss sustained by fire. From a judgment in their favor, the defendant has appealed.

The appellant’s controlling contention is that the trial court erred in denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict of the jury. On August IS, 1904, the appellant issued to the respondents an insurance policy which did not, upon its face, contain any stipulation requiring the assured to make any proofs of loss, nor did it…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Staats v. Pioneer InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Farmers' Insurance & Loan Co. v. SnyderCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
  3. Ruthven Bros. v. American Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  4. Planters' Mutual Insurance v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  5. Davis v. Northwestern Mutual Fire Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. SWITZERLAND GEN. INS. CO., LTD.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. WannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Brown v. State Automobile Insurance Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Ehrke v. North American Life & Casualty Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Glant v. Lloyd's Register of ShippingWashington Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API