Buck v. Canty
California Supreme Court
APPEAL, from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County and from an order refusing a new trial. George E. Church, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This is an action to quiet title to lands in Fresno County of which plaintiff is conceded to be the owner, unless, as is claimed, by defendant, the latter acquired title thereto under a tax-deed from the state.
The trial court found this tax-deed to be void and entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff from which, and an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.
The land in controversy was sold to the state on July 3, 1896, on account of delinquent taxes for the year 1895, and on March 31, 1905, a deed to the state therefor was made by the tax-collector. On April 6, 1905,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnson v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Teralta Land & Water Co. v. ShafferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Huffman v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Smith v. FurlongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Oullahan v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Dimmick v. DimmickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Maguire v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- County of San Bernardino v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Mercury Herald Co. v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.