Oullahan v. Sweeney
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County refusing, a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Hayne, C.
— Ejectment; judgment for defendant; plaintiff appeals. The case turns upon the validity of a tax deed, under which the plaintiff claims. The deed was made without any notice to the owner, as required by section 3785 of the Political Code. The sale was made in February, 1885, at which time the law was, that a re-, demption could be made in twelve months, and if not made within that time, the purchaser could obtain hig deed without giving notice to the owner. But by an amendment passed in March, 1885, it was provided that “the purchaser of property sold for delinquent taxes, or his…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Yeager v. FarwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Moore v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by13 opinions
- Buck v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Johnson v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Rollins v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Teralta Land & Water Co. v. ShafferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- State ex rel. National Bond & Security Co. v. KrahmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.