Legal Opinion

Dimmick v. Dimmick

California Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1962No. S. F. 20849PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

After trial before the court without a jury, in an action to quiet title to a parcel of land, the trial court found that plaintiff Oscar Dimmick (hereinafter referred to as “plaintiff”) and defendant Clarence Dimmick (hereinafter referred to as “defendant”) were joint tenants of the property and quieted title in plaintiff to an undivided one-half interest therein. Plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff and his wife sued defendant and his wife to quiet title to farm property in Kings County. In his answer defendant set up a claim that he was the owner of an undivided one-half interest in the land and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Damiani v. AlbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Johns v. ScobieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Miller v. Bay Cities Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Buck v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. West v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Bambridge v. WestermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Green v. City of OceansideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Baxter Healthcare Corp. v. DentonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Jones v. KvistadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Johnson v. BanducciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API