Huffman v. Hall
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Merced County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Harrison J.
The plaintiff is the owner of a tract of land in Merced county, lying to the east of the Snelling road, and bounding upon Bear creek at the south. The defendant was the road overseer of road district Ho. 1 of Merced county, and on the 17th of January, 1889, destroyed and removed about 60 feet of a fence which extended from Bear creek northerly between the Snelling road and the plaintiff’s land, under the claim that it was an obstruction to a public road along the northerly bank of Bear creek. The plaintiff brought this action for damages for the alleged trespass, and to enjoin the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Quinn v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- People v. TisdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Bensley v. EllisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Hope v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Gloster v. WadeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Union Transportation Co. v. Sacramento CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Schwerdtle v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Niles v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Buck v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- State ex rel. Maryland Casualty Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.