Legal Opinion
Swanson v. Alworth
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 2, 1926No. 24,819PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Action to recover for services in exploring for minerals under a contract by which the plaintiff was to have a weekly compensation and 10 per cent of the net profits resulting. The weekly compensation has been paid. The controversy is over claimed profits.
The case was here on appeal from an order denying the plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint and the order was sustained. 157 Minn. 312, 196 N. W. 260. It was here later on a proceeding in mandamus, original in this court, to compel the granting of a trial by jury. The writ was discharged upon the ground that mandamus was not the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Marston v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- State ex rel. Clapp v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Irvine v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. SodergrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- National Surety Co. v. WinslowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Landgraf v. EllsworthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.