Lamberson v. Jefferds
California Supreme Court
Motion in the Supreme Court to dismiss an appeal from the Superior Court of Tulare County. Wheaton A. Gray, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
Respondent asks that the appeal herein be dismissed on the ground that no undertaking on appeal was given, nor was there an order of court dispensing with the undertaking, as authorized by section 946 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Appellant claims that his case comes within the provisions of section 1058 of the Code óf Civil Procedure, which reads as follows: “ Any civil action or proceeding wherein the state, or the people of the state, is a party plaintiff, or any state officer, in his official capacity, or in behalf of the state, or any county, city and county, city, or town, is a party…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Linden v. CaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Carroll v. SiebenthalerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- People ex rel. Fries v. Supervisors of Marin Cty.California Supreme Court · 1858
- Connor v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Scheerer v. EdgarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by11 opinions
- Frohliger v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Maurice L. Bein, Inc. v. Housing Authority of City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Townsend Gas & Electric Light Co. v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Power v. MayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Coon v. SommercampIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.