Legal Opinion

Connor v. Morris

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1863PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Seventh Judicial District, Mendocino County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCrocker, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandamus, to issue against the defendant, Treasurer of the County of Mendocino, to compel him to pay two certain county warrants. The case was sent to a referee for trial, who reported a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, which was entered accordingly, and from which the defendant appeals.

The respondent moves to strike out all that portion of the record purporting to be the statement on appeal, on the ground that it is not properly authenticated, not having been agreed to by the parties or settled by the Judge or referee. The judgment in this case *450was…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
  2. State Commission in Lunacy v. WelchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. Lamberson v. JefferdsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Beeney v. IrwinColorado Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Lucas v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API