Legal Opinion
Frohliger v. Richardson
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 26, 1923No. Civ. No. 4526PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSt. Sure, J.
This appeal calls for an opinion upon the constitutionality of an act of the legislature appropriating ten thousand dollars for the restoration of the San Diego Mission.
The legislature, at its session in 1921, passed the following act (Stats. 1921, p. 1722):
“An act to provide for the restoration of the San Diego Mission, appointing a committee therefor, and providing an appropriation to carry this into effect.
‘ ‘ The People of the State of California do enact as follows:
“Section 1. The Governor of this state is hereby empowered to appoint a committee of three citizens of the State of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stevenson v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Conlin v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Daggett v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Bourn v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Power v. MayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Philip K. Paulson v. City of San Diego Mt. Soledad Memorial Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- California Educational Facilities Authority v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Hewitt v. JoynerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Hewitt v. JoynerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Thomas v. Daughters of Utah PioneersUtah Supreme Court · 1948
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.