Legal Opinion

Giddings & Lewis Machine Tool Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 12, 1968No. C.D. 3612PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The merchandise involved in these cases, consolidated at the trial, consists of three models of machines bearing the trade name “Endomatic”, produced by Giddings & Lewis-Fraser, Ltd., of Arbroath, Scotland. They were entered at the ports of Boston and New York in December 1963 and on various dates in 1964 and 1965, and were assessed with duty at 15 per centum ad valorem under item 674.35, Tariff Schedules of the United States, as “Metal-working-machine tools: Other”. It is claimed that they should have been classified at 12 per centum ad valorem under item 674.32 as “Metalworking…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Liebert v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. Clutsom Machines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  3. Durbrow & Hearne Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  4. Durbrow v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  5. John Heathcoat & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schick X-Ray Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. Fedtro, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. C. T. Takahashi & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  4. Hancock Gross, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  5. Trans-Atlantic Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API