Schick X-Ray Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Maletz, Judge:
This protest involves the proper duty rate on articles invoiced as automatic high-pressure injectors that were imported from Sweden via the port of New York in 1964. They were classified by the government under item 709.13 1 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States as syringes, and assessed duty of 42.5 percent ad valorem.
Plaintiff claims, in the alternative, that the articles are properly dutiable under one of the following items:
Item2 Classification Rate
660.90 Pumps for liquids_' 12% ad val.
688.40 Electrical articles, nspf_11.5% ad val.
709.17 Other electro-medical…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Astra Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Schick X-Ray Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- United-Carr Fastener Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Giddings & Lewis Machine Tool Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mattel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
- C. T. Takahashi & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
- J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- Durst Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
- Trans-Atlantic Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.