Hancock Gross, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Newman, Judge:
This case concerns the proper tariff classification for certain plumbing supplies imported from Japan and sold under the name of “Drain or Fill.”
The merchandise was assessed with duty at the rate of 17 per centum ad valorem under item 654.20 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS), and is claimed by plaintiff to be properly dutiable at the rate of 10 per centum ad valorem under item 660.94, TSUS, as amended by the Tariff Schedules Technical Amendments Act of 1965, Public Law 89-241, 78 Stat. 933, T.D. 56511.1
Statutes Involved
Tariff Schedules of the United States
Classi…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- United-Carr Fastener Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Durbrow & Hearne Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- Victoria Distributors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Durbrow v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fedtro, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Rainin Instrument Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Brooks Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972