John Heathcoat & Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Fonn, Judge:
Tbe protest listed above presents for determination the question of the proper classification of certain imported merchandise which was classified by the collector as silk netting not made on a bobbinet machine, and duty was levied thereon at the rate of •90 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1529 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Various claims are made in the protest but the claim relied upon is that the merchandise is properly dutiable at only 60 per centum ad valorem under said paragraph 1529 (a), as modified by the trade agreement with the United Kingdom, T. D. 49753, as nets…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Giddings & Lewis Machine Tool Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Fedtro, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Hancock Gross, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- John Heathcoat & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
- John Heathcoat & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951