Legal Opinion

Trans-Atlantic Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 28, 1971No. C.D. 4288PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rosenstein, Judge:

The merchandise involved herein, invoiced as “Wrought Steel Single Action Template Spring Hinges”, was assessed with duty at 17 per centum ad valorem under TSTJS item 647.03, as amended by the Tariff Schedules Technical Amendments Act of 1965, Pub. L. 82-241, 79 Stat. 933, which provides in pertinent part:

Hinges; and fittings and mountings not specially provided for, suitable for furniture, doors, windows, blinds, staircases, luggage, vehicle coach work, caskets, cabinets, and similar uses; all the foregoing, of base metal, whether or not coated or plated with precious metal:

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clutsom Machines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  2. United-Carr Fastener Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Durbrow & Hearne Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  4. Durbrow v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  5. Schick X-Ray Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Trans-Atlantic Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  2. Hampco Apparel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API