Legal Opinion

Clutsom Machines, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 29, 1948No. C. D. 1122PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

This case presents the question whether a machine which was designed exclusively to weave and knit in a single operation was properly classified by the collector of customs under the provision in paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for—

* * * all other textile machinery, finished or unfinished, not specially provided for, * * *.

and therefore subject to duty at the rate of 40 per centum ad valorem.

The importation in controversy is from Great Britain and is referred to in the invoice accompanying the entry papers as consisting of 19 cases containing 4 complete machines and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Durbrow & Hearne Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  2. Durbrow v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  3. Kayser v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  4. United States v. MillsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. V. Alexander & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. United-Carr Fastener Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. A. Tanzi Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  4. Janex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
  5. Giddings & Lewis Machine Tool Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API