Maas v. Perkins
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHamley, J.
This is an action to recover damages and for an injunction because of defendants’ alleged trespass and continuing nuisance in permitting oil, sludge, and waste to drain from their properties onto the properties of plaintiffs.
In 1936, while plaintiffs Henry and Irene Maas were husband and wife, they acquired a tract of land about a mile north of the city of Vancouver, in Clark county, Washington. This tract had a frontage of two hundred thirty-one feet on the west side of the Pacific highway. Plaintiffs were divorced in 1947, at which time Henry quitclaimed to Irene the southerly one hundred…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Little v. Lynn & Marblehead Real Estate Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Swift & Co. v. Peoples Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Dunlap v. Seattle National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Snavely v. City of GoldendaleWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Meloy v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brown v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
- Smith v. RodeneWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Phennah v. WhalenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- In the Matter of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Company, Debtor. Cmc Heartland Partners v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Litts v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.