Phennah v. Whalen
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtRingold, J.
The plaintiffs, Haydn P. Phennah and Dorothy E. Phennah, appeal the dismissal of this cause on a challenge to the sufficiency of their evidence at the close of the defendants' case. The dispositive question presented for our consideration is whether the defendants are entitled to a dismissal when the plaintiffs fail to proffer an evidentiary basis for the segregation of damages among successive tort-feasors. We answer in ‘the negative and therefore reverse the judgment of the trial court dismissing this action.
Dorothy E. Phennah, a woman in her mid-sixties with a preexisting osteoarthritic…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Seattle-First National Bank v. Shoreline Concrete Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- Godfrey v. WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Moyer v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- DeNike v. MoweryWashington Supreme Court · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Martin v. Abbott LaboratoriesWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
- Sheikh v. ChoeWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Montalvo v. LapezHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- Cox v. SpanglerWashington Supreme Court · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.