Legal Opinion

Phennah v. Whalen

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 22, 1980No. 7861-5-IPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRingold, J.

The plaintiffs, Haydn P. Phennah and Dorothy E. Phennah, appeal the dismissal of this cause on a challenge to the sufficiency of their evidence at the close of the defendants' case. The dispositive question presented for our consideration is whether the defendants are entitled to a dismissal when the plaintiffs fail to proffer an evidentiary basis for the segregation of damages among successive tort-feasors. We answer in ‘the negative and therefore reverse the judgment of the trial court dismissing this action.

Dorothy E. Phennah, a woman in her mid-sixties with a preexisting osteoarthritic…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Seattle-First National Bank v. Shoreline Concrete Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Godfrey v. WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Moyer v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. DeNike v. MoweryWashington Supreme Court · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Martin v. Abbott LaboratoriesWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Sheikh v. ChoeWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Montalvo v. LapezHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Cox v. SpanglerWashington Supreme Court · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API