Legal Opinion

Snavely v. City of Goldendale

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1941No. 28325PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing the action, after the entry of orders sustaining demurrers to the complaint. In a single cause of action, plaintiffs seek to recover from the city of Goldendale, its mayor and councilmen, and from the defendants Klein, doing business as Goldendale Meat Company, damages resulting from the pollution of the waters of the Little Klickitat river. In their complaint, plaintiffs allege:

That the stream runs through or near Goldendale; that, riparian to the stream, plaintiffs own property about-half a mile below the city, which they, for many years, have…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kincaid v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. McDaniel v. City of CherryvaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Platt Bros. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
  4. Pickerill v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  5. Wong Kee Jun v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Seattle-First National Bank v. Shoreline Concrete Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Boitano v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Phennah v. WhalenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  4. Dickgieser v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Dickgieser v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API