Legal Opinion

Little v. Lynn & Marblehead Real Estate Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 13, 1938PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolan, J.

These are two actions of tort which were tried to a jury. At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence in each case, the judge allowed a motion of the defendant for a directed verdict in its favor on each count of the declaration, and reported his action for the consideration of this court. Under the terms of the report in each case, if the action was correct judgment is to be entered for the defendant; otherwise a new trial is.to be ordered.

The evidence in its aspect most favorable to the plaintiffs would have warranted the. jury in finding the following facts. On January 30, 1935, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Stone v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  2. Cosulich v. Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Bellows v. Worcester Storage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. World Fire & Marine Insurance v. Alliance Sandblasting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  5. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Pittsfield Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WelanskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Menth v. Breeze Corporation, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  3. Home Savings Bank v. SavranskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Cigna Insurance v. OY Saunatec, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  5. Commonwealth v. GodinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API