Legal Opinion

Smith v. Rodene

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1966No. 38119PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barnett, J. †

As a result of two separate and distinct automobile collisions, plaintiffs, Arnold and Yvonne Smith, brought consolidated actions against (1) defendant Helen Rodene and (2) all of the remaining defendants, to whom we shall hereinafter refer, collectively, as “Grimes.” The causes were tried to a jury, which returned a verdict on the first cause in favor of both plaintiffs against defendant Rodene in the amount of $17,603; and on the second cause in favor of plaintiff Yvonne Smith against defendants Grimes in the amount of $20,395. Appeal is taken by all defendants.

The first…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Maddux v. DonaldsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Gerberg v. CrosbyWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Spade v. Lynn & Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  4. Warren v. HynesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Young v. DilleWashington Supreme Court · 1923

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Grimsby v. SamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Seattle-First National Bank v. Shoreline Concrete Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Kloepfel v. BokorWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Kloepfel v. BokorWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Keck v. JacksonArizona Supreme Court · 1979

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API