Legal Opinion

Meloy v. City of Santa Monica

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 5, 1932No. Docket No. 4552PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, P. J.

Defendant demurred to plaintiff’s amended complaint, the demurrer was sustained; plaintiff refusing to further amend, judgment was rendered for defendant, from which judgment plaintiff appeals.

The amended complaint alleges that for the past twenty years appellant has been and now is the owner and in possession of lot 1, tract 6437, in the city of Los Angeles, containing about sixty acres; that for many years past she has resided in her dwelling situated near the southerly end of the westerly boundary of her said land and has for many years caused, and is now causing, her said property to be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kalis v. ShattuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Gould v. StaffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Gilliland v. Chicago & Alton RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Shellman v. HersheyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  5. Keenan v. Commissioners of New Hanover CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Laurenzi v. VranizanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Anderson v. SouzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. City of Phoenix v. HarlanArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Wilson v. . DowtinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Spain v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API