Legal Opinion

Goetzel v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 2019No. S-18-0197PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRICKEN, District Judge.

[¶1] Appellant, Darrel Goetzel, challenges the district court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. This Court concludes *866that res judicata bars his claims and affirms on those grounds.

ISSUE

[¶2] In his appeal, Goetzel states the issue(s) as follows:

The Defendant's motion was barred by res judicata by the District Court. Further the Wyoming Supreme Court barred the Defendant[']s claim in a prior case with similar issues [sic] this is due to ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. More specifically appellate counsel never submitted critical information…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Wainwright v. TornaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Cutbirth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Rubeling v. RubelingWyoming Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Hamill v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Joseph Newton Best v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Joseph Michael Cruzen v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Brian Todd Russell v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Matthew Harl Majhanovich v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Gerald Lee Uden v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API