Goetzel v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KRICKEN, District Judge.
[¶1] Appellant, Darrel Goetzel, challenges the district court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. This Court concludes *866that res judicata bars his claims and affirms on those grounds.
ISSUE
[¶2] In his appeal, Goetzel states the issue(s) as follows:
The Defendant's motion was barred by res judicata by the District Court. Further the Wyoming Supreme Court barred the Defendant[']s claim in a prior case with similar issues [sic] this is due to ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. More specifically appellate counsel never submitted critical information…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Wainwright v. TornaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cutbirth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Rubeling v. RubelingWyoming Supreme Court · 1965
- Hamill v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Joseph Newton Best v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
- Joseph Michael Cruzen v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
- Brian Todd Russell v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
- Matthew Harl Majhanovich v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
- Gerald Lee Uden v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.