Legal Opinion

Amin v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2006No. 05-259PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

[¶ 1] Appellant, Abdullah Kru Amin (Amin), seeks review of the district court’s order denying his motion which he denominated “Motion for Illegal Sentence Rule 35(a).” The district court also denied Amin’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel. Amin asks that we appoint an attorney to represent him in this appeal. We will affirm the order of the district court and we decline to appoint counsel for Amin in these proceedings.

ISSUES

[¶ 2] Amin’s brief is not in the form required by W.R.A.P. 7.01. However, we discern from his brief the following issues:

1.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Amin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Amin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Amin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Lacey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McDaniel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  2. DAX v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Cooper v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Steven R. Barela v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API