Legal Opinion
Arche, Inc. v. Azaleia, U.S.A., Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 12, 1995No. 93 Civ. 0817 (LAK)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KAPLAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a French manufacturer of ladies’ footwear, claims that defendants, a Brazilian footwear manufacturer and its U.S. distributor, have violated their rights under the Lan-ham Act, among other legal doctrines, by imitating the trade dress of plaintiffs so-called P-sole shoes. The matter is before the Court on defendants’ motions in limine. Defendants seek to exclude plaintiffs consumer survey, including the testimony of the interviewer and eight interview respondents, on the ground that plaintiff failed to comply with discovery requirements and,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd., Nintendo of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Outley v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- George Basch Co. v. Blue Coral, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Resource Developers, Inc. v. Statue of Liberty-Ellis Island Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Reebok International Ltd. v. K-Mart Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
3Cited by6 opinions
- Trouble v. Wet Seal, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Conopco, Inc. v. Cosmair, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Friesland Brands, B v. v. Vietnam National Milk Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Estee Lauder, Inc. v. the Gap, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Evans v. Port AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.