Legal Opinion
Conopco, Inc. v. Cosmair, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 7, 1999No. 98 Civ. 4337(JES)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
In this action for trademark infringement, trade dress infringement, unfair competition and dilution, plaintiffs Conop-eo, Inc., d/b/a Calvin, Klein Cosmetics Company, and Calvin Klein Cosmetic Corporation (collectively “Conopeo”) seek a preliminary injunction against Cosmair, Inc., Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation, and PRL USA Holdings, Inc., (collectively “Cosmair”), from selling or advertising one of Cosmair’s new products that Conopeo claims, inter alia, ■ infringes on its trademark and trade dress rights. For the reasons set forth below;…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Doe Lang, Petitioner/defendant-Appellant v. Retirement Living Publishing Co., Inc., Respondent/plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- McGregor-Doniger Inc. v. Drizzle Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Lois Sportswear, U.S.A., Inc., and Textiles Y Confecciones Europeas, S.A. v. Levi Strauss & Company, Defendant-Plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Malletier v. Dooney & Bourke, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Trouble v. Wet Seal, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Coty Inc. v. Excell Brands, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Paco Sport, Ltd. v. Paco Rabanne ParfumsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Glow Industries, Inc. v. LopezDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.