Legal Opinion
Reebok International Ltd. v. K-Mart Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 15, 1994No. 92 Civ. 8871 (CHT)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
TENNEY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Reebok International Ltd. (“Reebok USA”) and Reebok International Limited (“Reebok UK”) (collectively “Reebok”), bring this action against defendants K-Mart Corporation (“K-Mart”), Melville Corporation (“Melville”) and Leif J. Ostberg Corporation (“LJO”), alleging that K-Mart stores have sold a sneaker that infringes on Reebok trademarks and trade dress. Plaintiffs’ complaint alleges: (1) trademark infringement under Lanham Act § 32(1), 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1), (2) false designation of origin and unfair competition under Lanham Act § 43(a), 15…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Doe Lang, Petitioner/defendant-Appellant v. Retirement Living Publishing Co., Inc., Respondent/plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- McGregor-Doniger Inc. v. Drizzle Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Lois Sportswear, U.S.A., Inc., and Textiles Y Confecciones Europeas, S.A. v. Levi Strauss & Company, Defendant-Plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- A & H Sportswear Inc. Mainstream Swimsuits, Inc. v. Victoria's Secret Stores, Inc. Victoria's Secret Catalogue, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Clinique Laboratories, Inc. v. Dep Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Pfizer Inc. v. Astra Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Estee Lauder, Inc. v. the Gap, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Arche, Inc. v. Azaleia, U.S.A., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.