Legal Opinion

Evans v. Port Authority

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 13, 2001No. 00 CIV. 5753(LAK)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUYI OPINION

KAPLAN, District Judge.

This employment discrimination action has been marked by unusual acrimony and by an unusual number of applications to the Court concerning discovery difficulties born of that strife. The Port Authority defendants (hereinafter “PA”) now have moved, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(f) and 37, to preclude plaintiff from offering testimony from certain witnesses identified in plaintiffs long overdue answers to interrogatories.

Facts

This Court held an initial pretrial conference on September 25, 2000 at which it directed that discovery be completed by March 25,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Arche, Inc. v. Azaleia, U.S.A., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Evans v. Port Authority of New York and New JerseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API