Legal Opinion
Friesland Brands, B v. v. Vietnam National Milk Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 25, 2002No. 00 CIV.4287 GWGPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is the motion in limine of defendants Vietnam National Milk Company and Tsai’s International Trading Co. (collectively, “Vinamilk”) to preclude the admission into evidence of a consumer survey, an art historian’s report and related testimony. Plaintiff Friesland Brands B.V. (“Friesland”) opposes the motion. The parties have consented to this case being adjudicated by a United States Mag istrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Friesland…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Lois Sportswear, U.S.A., Inc., and Textiles Y Confecciones Europeas, S.A. v. Levi Strauss & Company, Defendant-Plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Mobil Oil Corporation v. Pegasus Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd., Nintendo of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Schering Corporation v. Pfizer Inc. And Ucb Pharma, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Malletier v. Dooney & Bourke, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Herbert Ltd. Partnership v. Electronic Arts Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Schwab v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- In re Simon II LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- A.V.E.L.A., Inc. v. Estate Of Marilyn Monroe, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.