Legal Opinion

Bonifas-Gorman Lumber Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1946No. Docket No. 15, Calendar No. 42,604PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaer, J.

During the years 1938 and 1939, plaintiff corporation was engaged in lumbering operations in the counties of Houghton and Keweenaw. In connection with the carrying on of the business plaintiff entered into written contracts with various piece workers, including the individual defendants and appellees in this case. Said contracts were all in substantially the same form, some providing for the cutting of saw logs from standing timber, and others for the cutting, manufacturing and piling of merchantable pulp wood and cedar tie cuts. Exhibit 1, which is typical of the contracts in question, is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Lawrence Baking Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Tuttle v. Embury-Martin Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. ACME Messenger Service Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  5. O'Brian v. Michigan Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Powell v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Detroit Edison Co. v. JanoszMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Detroit Edison Co. v. Department of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State v. FlackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  5. Freiborg v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API