Legal Opinion

Tuttle v. Embury-Martin Lumber Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1916No. Docket No. 15PublishedCited by 79 opinions

Certiorari to the Industrial Accident Board. Sarah Tuttle presented her claim for compensation against the Embury-Martin Lumber Company and the Lumbermen’s Mutual Casualty Company for the death of her husband in defendant lumber company’s employ. From an order awarding compensation, respondents bring certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, C. J.

The question involved in this case is whether Ephraim Tuttle, the deceased husband of Sarah Tuttle, the applicant, was an independent contractor or an employee within the provisions of the workmen’s compensation act. The Industrial Accident Board found that his relation was that of employee, and from that finding the respondents have brought the case here by certiorari.

Ephraim Tuttle, for whose death applicant claims compensation, was engaged in hauling logs for the Embury-Martin Lumber Company, near Cheboygan, on January 8,1915, and met his death by being thrown from a load of logs while he…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gall v. Detroit Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. State ex rel. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. De Forrest v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1852
  4. Cockran v. RiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Messmer v. Bell & Coggeshall Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Hillen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Kelley's Dependents v. Hoosac Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921
  3. King v. GallowayTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  4. Smith Bros., Inc. v. O'BryanTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Powell v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API