Legal Opinion

Freiborg v. Chrysler Corporation

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1957No. Docket 36, Calendar 47,010PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, C. J.

Plaintiff was employed to work in one of defendant’s plants. Defendant owned a *105parking lot located about 200 yards from the entrance by which plaintiff gained admission to the plant. As indicated by a posted sign and established by evidence, defendant maintained the lot exclusively for automobile parking by its employees while working in that plant. Because it was necessary to arrive early in order to find a parking place on the lot, plaintiff parked his automobile there 45 minutes before his working hours for the day began. After parking and while walking on the lot en route to the plant, he…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Lawrence Baking Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Rookledge v. GarwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Haller v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Stockley v. School District No. 1 of Portage Township.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Kunze v. Detroit Shade Tree Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Whetro v. AwkermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Tata v. MuskovitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Dyer v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Nemeth v. Michigan Building ComponentsMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Simkins v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API