Legal Opinion
Martin v. Monfort, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided May 20, 1993No. Civ. A. No. 92-C-2456PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
PRINGLE, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the plaintiffs Motion to Compel further response to Interrogatory 10. In essence, plaintiff seeks production of time and motion studies performed by Monfort at the direction of Monfort’s general counsel.1 Defendant contends that the studies are protected from discovery by attorney work product immunity. On April 29,1993, the Court ruled on all other aspects of the plaintiffs Motion to Compel, but deferred ruling on the work product issue until the parties submitted further…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re LTV Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated Dec. 18, 1981, Etc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1982
- Toledo Edison Company and Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company v. G a Technologies, Inc., Torrey Pines Technology DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1989
- In re Air Crash Disaster at Detroit Metropolitan Airport on August 16, 1987District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Pacamor Bearings, Inc. v. Minebea Co., Ltd.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
- Matter of Firestorm 1991Washington Supreme Court · 1996
- In re Grand Jury SubpoenaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. GoldstoneDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Roe v. Catholic Health Initiatives ColoradoDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.