Pacamor Bearings, Inc. v. Minebea Co., Ltd.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DEVINE, Senior District Judge.
As testament that the modern trend is to litigate on paper rather than in a courtroom, the court has before it for consideration plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment, defendants’ cross-motion for partial summary judgment, defendants’ objection to the magistrate judge’s order quashing a discovery subpoena, defendants’ objection to the magistrate judge’s ruling on document privileges, twelve motions in limine, and the associated objections (and occasional surreplies) 1 thereto. So that this matter may make its final approach to trial, currently…
2Cases cited110 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Boyd v. Comdata Network, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- Millennium Communications & Fulfillment, Inc. v. Office of Atty. Gen.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Harvell v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Neuder v. Battelle Pacific Northwest National LaboratoryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- In Re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.